LWV to allow write-ins to participate in candidates' forum
I read with interest a recent
letter to the editor from Kathleen Propp of the Winnebago County League of
Women Voters, in which she stated that those people who have registered as
write-in candidates for the spring Oshkosh Common council election WILL BE invited
to participate in the League’s upcoming forum. Simply put, this is just wrong, in my opinion.
The League’s stated reason for
this unusual move is that with three open seats and only two candidates whose
names will appear on the ballot, it is likely one of the two write-ins will be
elected to the other seat and this will give voters the right to know something
about them.
I understand what they’re
saying but do we really want to see either of these candidates elected to the
council? Personally, I don’t think either one of the two write-ins should get
elected. After all they took out nominations papers and either didn’t get them
returned on time (Don Binder) or turned them in with so many errors that
several names were rejected, leaving that candidate (Brian Poeschl) without
enough signatures to get on the ballot. Neither of those situations instills
any confidence in me that they will act with any greater care or responsibility
when it comes to performing their duties, if elected. Will they carefully read the
material about matters on which they’ll be voting – more carefully than they
did their instructions for the filing of nomination papers? Will they take the
time to read it at all, in its entirety? Or will they perform in a slack-jaw,
lazy manner with this, too? I would hope they would take their responsibility
seriously and read all the material, understanding time is often of the essence
in politics. But they’re certainly not starting out too well, nor establishing
a good track record.
If I had to pick one of the two
I’d go with Poeschl, since he at least tried. But the problem I have there is
he’s served on the Common Council before and has also run in other elections
after his original time of service. So he knows how to fill out the forms and
should have checked over his paperwork more carefully before turning it in at
the 11th hour when he had no ample time to get the errors fixed.
I’ve stated in an earlier
editorial that I see this move on the part of these two candidates as being
very opportunistic and taking the lazy-man’s way out, especially since they
know one of them is bound to get elected by default. My position is nothing
personal with either of these two. I personally like Brian Poeschl, having been
acquainted with him for many years; I don’t know Don Binder at all – wouldn’t
even know him if I passed him on the street. My position is based solely on how
they’ve approached this. I don’t think we should be rewarding write-in
candidates with the same ability to participate in debates that the other
candidates who followed the rules of the process get.
Finally, the League may be setting another bad precedent with this move. In the past they’ve allowed friends or family members of candidates to read prepared statements at the forums of the candidate themselves couldn’t be there; now they’re allowing write-in candidates to participate in the “debate.” Seems like just one more step down that slippery slope for the League.
What do you think? Leave us a comment and/or vote in the poll to the right.
Finally, the League may be setting another bad precedent with this move. In the past they’ve allowed friends or family members of candidates to read prepared statements at the forums of the candidate themselves couldn’t be there; now they’re allowing write-in candidates to participate in the “debate.” Seems like just one more step down that slippery slope for the League.
What do you think? Leave us a comment and/or vote in the poll to the right.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home